End of Shackling for Prisoners Condemned to Death

 On Wednesday last, news began to trickle from Bang Kwang prison of the momentous end to the practice of permanently shackling all the approximately 590 male prisoners condemned to death. The first to convey the news were two Bang Kwang prisoners not in communication with each other. Later the news was confirmed by officials in the Department of Corrections, and in the Ministry of Justice. It is reported that the order to remove the shackles was given by the Director General of the Department, Pol. Col. Suchart Wongananchai.
Shackles were welded on the ankles of prisoners on the day they were first sentenced by the court of first instance, despite the fact that they must still be considered innocent until Appeal and Supreme Courts confirmed their sentence. The shackles were removed after their execution, or on commutation of their sentences, passing of a lesser sentence by the higher courts, or annulment of the original sentence.
The use of such shackles was cruel and inhumane, preventing prisoners from exercising and being an obstacle to personal hygiene. Abrasions caused by the shackles became easily infected and were a serious threat to health.
In 2005 the UN Human Rights Commission had strongly protested the use of such shackles, but no action was taken to stop the practice. Although Bang Kwang prison is a high security detention centre, it was claimed that shackles were necessary to prevent escape and restrain dangerous criminals.
Death Penalty Thailand welcomes this belated humane act. We hope that the death penalty itself will soon be abolished in affirmation of the right to life, the basis of all other human rights

Death Penalty - Facts from Figures

Prisoners Sentenced to Death in Thailand: December 2012

   (Figures for June 2012 shown in brackets)

All Cases

Gender	Appeal Court	Supreme Court	Convicted	Total
Male	350 (328)	214 (274)	27 (52)	591 (634)
Female	58 (55)	9 (11)	0 (6)	67 (72)
Total	408 (383)	223 (285)	27 (58)	658 (726)

Narcotics

Gender	Appeal Court	Supreme Court	Convicted	Total
Male	183 (156)	78 (89)	8 (31)	269 (276)
Female	48 (45)	8 (10)	0 (6)	56 (61)
Total	231 (201)	86 (99)	8 (37)	325 (337)

Homicide

Gender	Appeal Court	Supreme Court	Convicted	Total
Male	167 (172)	136 (185)	19 (21)	322 (378)
Female	10 (10)	1 (1)	0 (0)	11 (11)
Total	177 (182)	137 (186)	19 (21)	333 (389)

Comments: The differences for the statistics for June and December reveal the important impact of the Royal Pardon granted on 11^th August, on occasion of the birthdays of Her Majesty the Queen, and the Crown Prince. As shown in the top “All Cases” category, in June, there were 58 prisoners for whom all legal process was completed. Following the pardon this number was reduced to zero. I confirmed this with a prison warder who assured me, referring to the number of prisoners facing possible execution, that there were no prisoners on death row, although it took almost three months to complete the formality of moving them to non-death penalty quarters, and removing the shackles, compulsory for death row prisoners. The number of female prisoners changed from 6 to 0 in August. There are no further completed convictions of women so that the figure remains 0 in December.

However, the number of convicted prisoners is now 27; these are cases where the death penalty has been confirmed by the Supreme Court, the only avenue by which these cases could have reached completion. At least some of these cases are due to convictions in the Southern Border Provinces, the source of most death sentences at present. The validity of death sentences coming from areas under martial law deserve investigation.

A further interesting observation may be made on the number of cases reaching the Appeal Court. These are cases which result from death sentences in the Courts of First Instance. Here we notice an increase of  408 – 383 = 25 over the June figure, which indicates a minimum number of new death sentences. It is a minimum because an unknown number of the cases before the Appeal Court may already have been removed due to dismissal or confirmation by that Court, removing them from the category of cases before the Appeal Court. Thus we know of at least 25 new death sentences over a six month period, which indicates an annual rate of death sentences of 50. UCL and other Thai human rights organizations have been reporting figures in this range over recent years. We obtained the data from the Department of Corrections, which does not itself publish this statistic. However, major databases of worldwide death penalty figures based in the UK and US have been quoting single digit figures for the annual rate of death sentences in Thailand, probably basing their data on sentences reported only in the English language press. Commentators have used the single digit figures to comment favourably on the decline in use of the death penalty in Thai justice. Sad to say, the death penalty is still being applied at an average rate of one per week. Pressure on prison accommodation is probably a factor in the attempts of some politicians and government officials to accelerate executions. For the moment they may be restrained by appearing to counter the Royal intention shown in the recent pardon. But for how long? It is encouraging that despite the statements of the promoters of the death penalty that those convicted on drug charges would not be pardoned, they have indeed been pardoned.

Restorative Justice: Theory and a Practice

The Theory:

Most modern justice systems focus on a crime, a lawbreaker and a punishment. But a concept called “restorative justice” considers harm done and strives for agreement from all concerned — the victims, the offender and the community — on making amends. And it allows victims, who often feel shut out of the prosecutorial process, a way to be heard and participate. In this country, restorative justice takes a number of forms, but perhaps the most prominent is restorative-justice diversion. There are not many of these programs — a few exist on the margins of the justice system in communities like Baltimore, Minneapolis and Oakland, Calif. — but, according to a University of Pennsylvania study in 2007, they have been effective at reducing recidivism. Typically, a facilitator meets separately with the accused and the victim, and if both are willing to meet face to face without animosity and the offender is deemed willing and able to complete restitution, then the case shifts out of the adversarial legal system and into a parallel restorative-justice process. All parties — the offender, victim, facilitator and law enforcement — come together in a forum sometimes called a restorative-community conference. Each person speaks, one at a time and without interruption, about the crime and its effects, and the participants come to a consensus about how to repair the harm done.

The methods are mostly applied in less serious crimes, like property offenses in which the wrong can be clearly righted — stolen property returned, vandalized material replaced. The processes are designed to be flexible enough to handle violent crime like assault, but they are rarely used in those situations. And no one I spoke to had ever heard of restorative justice applied for anything as serious as murder. 

The Practice:

www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/magazine/can-forgiveness-play-a-role-in-criminal-justice.html?pagewanted=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130106

A detailed account of Restorative Justice applied in an unusual case. A man shoots dead his girl friend after days of argument. Parents of the girl friend take the complex path of restorative justice.

Taiwan continues to harvest the organs of executed prisoners

Taiwan has claimed to no longer harvest body parts of executed prisoners. However*:

Flesh-cooking convict's organs transplanted

• Published: 23/12/2012 at 06:46 PM
• Online news: Asia

A hospital in Taiwan harvested organs and other body parts from one of six executed death row inmates, in a controversial procedure that could help five patients, local media reported Sunday.

Inmates at Changhua jail in Taiwan's central Erlin township. A hospital in Taiwan harvested organs and other body parts from one of six executed death row inmates, in a controversial procedure that could help five patients, local media reported Sunday.

Taiwanese authorities executed six death row prisoners Friday, the largest number to be put to death in one day in recent years, amid an ongoing debate about the maintenance of capital punishment.
Three inmates had agreed to donate their organs but doctors only harvested material from one of them, the United Daily News said.
Chen Chin-huo, convicted of murdering a woman and cooking her flesh, had his liver, two kidneys, corneas and bone removed, the newspaper reported.
"The donation will benefit at least five patients waiting for transplanting of organs," it said, without identifying the hospital where the procedure took place.
The Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in the south refused to harvest organs from a second inmate.
Lin Hsin-yi, of the Taiwan Alliance to End Death Penalty, told AFP that death row inmates had to give consent for their organs to be removed but that some doctors refused to perform such operations.
"Unlike the people who die of illnesses or killed in accidents, the inmates have their lives taken by force," she said.
"As doctors need to race against time, the inmates are sent to the hospital as soon as possible after execution.
"Against that backdrop, some doctors may feel they are removing organs from people who are still (medically) alive."
The justice ministry did not reveal how the six inmates were executed Friday but usually death row convicts in Taiwan are put to death with a bullet to the head.
Taiwan is one of the few countries where organ harvesting from death row inmates is allowed.
Taiwan executed five prisoners in March 2011 and four in April 2010. The 2010 executions were the first after a hiatus that had lasted since 2005.
The death penalty debate reignited in Taiwan after the playground murder of a 10-year-old boy whose throat was slit.
Following reports suggesting the 29-year-old suspect was allegedly looking forward to free board and lodgings in jail, angry protesters gathered at the justice ministry demanding the island's death row inmates be executed.
The debate has also been fuelled by the 1997 execution of a soldier wrongly convicted in a child murder case.

Prisoners whose organs are harvested in Taiwan are executed as they lie in a plastic bath. Rather than the usual bullet in the heart, the prisoner is executed by a single bullet in the brain stem. The still breathing body is put on life support until doctors remove organs, hence the report that the donor is still medically alive. In previous practice, those condemned could donate organs but under criticism that the donation could not be freely made in the stress of impending execution, the harvesting of prisoner organs was said to be discontinued. Not quite, it seems from this report. The hesitations of "some doctors" are well founded.

Executions in Taiwan

Execution Chamber Taiwan* by Toshi Kazama

Zeng Si-ru, Hung Ming-tsung, Huang Hsien-cheng, Chen Chin-huo, Kuang Te-chiang and Tai Te-ying were executed on Friday 21st December at different locations across Taiwan.

The executions by shooting are the first in the country this year. Five people were executed in 2011 and 55 people are awaiting execution and have exhausted all appeals.

The sentences were carried out late Friday, a day after Justice Minister Tseng Yung-fu signed the execution orders, a government statement said.
The six men who were executed had been convicted of "grave offenses" such as fatal kidnappings and multiple murders and were executed because of the brutality of their crimes, the statement said.
Their sentences were confirmed by court authorities at various levels, and the executions were carried out simultaneously in four prisons across the island, officials said.
The last executions in Taiwan were in March 2011, when five men were put to death.

The authorities have repeatedly declared their intention to move away from using the death penalty and lead a public debate on the issue.
Deputy Justice Minister Chen Shou-huang said on 19 December that the authorities would carry out death sentences on its own schedule and will not be influenced by foreign experts. On 20th December 111  countries voted in the United Nations General Assembly in favour of a Moratoriium on the death penalty, the day that the death sentences were signed. While Taiwan is not a member of the UN, it very much courts its approval and has set up its own monitoring functions on human rights to mimic UN procedures. The emptiness of its monitoring functions is displayed by its actions.

On 14th November the author of this blog discussed the death penalty with the Deputy Justice Minister during an interview arranged with an investigative team from the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH). The Minister did not accept that Taiwan was bound to refrain from executions by Taiwan's promised adherence to the standards of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, now interpreted by experts in international law to necessarily involve abolition. He affirmed his belief that Capital Punishment is an effective deterrent to crime. Finally, he affirmed adherence to biblical authority for the slogan "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth", unaware, it seems, that the phrase is specifically rejected in the New Testament.We surmise that he is also totally unaware of the vote in the UN General Assembly.

*There are slightly different accounts of the execution procedure. The following is consistent with the image shown; to the right is the last meal provided to the condemned person. The condemned lies face down on a sheet on the floor, which is covered in black sand to reduce the contrast of fresh blood. A medical practitioner marks where his heart is. The prisoner is shot from behind three times at close range.Death at its most clinical and cruel.

Schabas on death penalty

During a roundtable discussion in the Bangkok Office of the UN Secretariat Professor William Schabas commented on current trends in abolition of the death penalty. Worldwide abolition of the death penalty is inevitable.
He pointed out that for several years the rate of approach to total abolition has been an average of 2.5 countries per year. However 2.5 from a current total of about 40 countries retaining the death penalty is a much higher that 2.5 countries out of the 80 retentionist countries of several years ago.
He noted the great reduction in the number of executions in the countries which retain the death penalty, saying that this amounts to a reduction in executions equivalent to total abolition in other countries.
The category of countries "abolitionist in practice" for countries which have not carried out executions for ten years or more, in fact shows a strong commitment to abolition which is only very rarely reversed.
Regarding the US, a seeming stronghold of the death penalty, change is likely to come through a vote by Supreme Court judges. It is likely that court appointments to be made by Obama in his second term of presidency will tip the scale and end US use of the death penalty.
Even in China, major executioner of the world, there is a notable reduction in the number of executions, and abolition is now accepted as a long term objective. Singapore, once identified as having the highest rate of executions compared to its population has retreated from this embarrassing position, and now executes perhaps one a year, or less.
Abolition can come with unexpected speed. He recalled a meeting in 1994 where he sat next to representatives of Russia and South Africa. They assured him that their two countries had no intention of changing their practice of execution. However, within one year both countries committed themselves to a moratorium on executions.
Professor Schabas spoe of his experience of raising the constitutionality of the death penalty, first in Canada, and later in Indonesia where three of nine judges voted that the death penalty is contrary to constitutional rights.

Addendum: On completing his visit to Bangkok, Professor Schabas posts on his blog: humanrightsdoctorate.blogspot.com
 Until about 2003, Thailand was regularly executing 8 to 10 people a year, with a focus on drug offences. From 2004 until 2009 there were no executions, but that year two convicted drug criminals were put to death. Since then, nothing.

Pol. Col. Dr. Naras Savestanan, who is Director General of the Department of Rights and Liberties Protection of Thailand's Ministry of Justice.

On Tuesday, I met with Wanchai Rujjanawong, who is Director-General of the International Affairs Department of the Office of the Attorney General. He assured me that the last execution in Thailand had taken place. Although he did not expect any legislative reform, he said that by 2019 we would be able to count Thailand as de facto abolitionist under the principle that a state that has not actually conducted an execution for ten years is deemed to have abolished the death penalty in fact.

My conclusion is that Thailand is now in a quite determined and intentional moratorium, although it is not yet prepared to declare so officially.

Death Penalty Seminar 12/12/12

 Thailand is falling behind its neighbours when it comes to abolition of the death penalty, activists and experts said at a seminar yesterday.

PRAVIT ROJANAPHRUK
THE NATION December 13, 2012 1:00 am

The event, organised by the Union for Civil Liberty with support from the European Union, the French Embassy and others, brought together participants from across Southeast Asia to Thammasat University in Bangkok. There was talk of progress made in the region and a call for Thailand to speed up the abolition of the death penalty.

"We sincerely urge Thailand to take the lead" in abolishing the death penalty in the region, said Debbie Stothard, deputy secretary-general of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH). Two countries in the region, the Philippines and Cambodia, no longer have the death penalty, she said.

In Southeast Asia, Thailand's death-row population is second to that of Malaysia, where about 900 prisoners are awaiting execution.

In Thailand, the number of inmates on death row is around 600 - about half of them drug-trafficking convicts, according to Amnesty International Thailand.

Singapore was named by Amnesty International in 2004 as the country with the highest per-capita ratio of death-row prisoners, but their numbers have since been markedly reduced with far fewer executions in recent years, said Mabasamy Ravi, a lawyer and death-penalty opponent from Singapore.

In Vietnam, which like Thailand still retains the death penalty, the right to life is increasingly viewed as important by Vietnamese authorities, said academic Ngo Ming Huong.

Thailand last executed two inmates in 2009, said Pol Colonel Aeknarat Sawettanand, director-general of the Department of Rights and Liberty Protection. He reported that department will engage in two phases of work in order to gain more knowledge from abroad and in Thailand and enable the public to better understand and be sensitised to the fact that death penalty doesn't help reduce severe crimes.

Aeknarat said many Thais are still in the mindset of revenge and retribution, which poses a hurdle in trying to convince them that it is against human rights standards to retain the death penalty. Back in the 1960s, said Aeknarat, prime minister Field Marshal Sarit Thanarat used Penal Code Article 17 to summarily execute arson suspects. Many Thais thought it was swift justice.

"I think times have changed," said Aeknarat. Besides growing opposition to the death penalty by some Thais and acceptance that death penalty is against human rights by the Justice Ministry, the Royal Thai Police have also increasingly recognised that forced disappearances and torture under interrogation are no longer acceptable, said Aeknarat.

However, the director-general admitted that Thai society is "addicted to violence" as reflected in the popularity of gruesome photos splashed on newspapers' front pages. "The mass media breed revenge and retribution," he said, adding that what Thailand needs is rehabilitation of people who commit crimes so they can become productive citizens.

Ultimately, it's up to Parliament to end the death penalty, Aeknarat said.
 

Thailand lags behind Asean in ending the death penalty

• Published: 14/12/2012 at 12:00 AM
• Bangkok Post 14/12/12

Human rights activists calling for the abolition of the death penalty say Thailand is lagging behind other countries in the region and the global community in bringing an end to capital punishment.

Antoine Madelin, a director at the International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH) told a seminar on the death penalty at Thammasat University on Wednesday that judges around the world have been limiting the scope of the death penalty.
Thailand is lagging behind its Asean neighbours, which are moving away from the death penalty in favour of clemency, judicial review, or abolition, Debbie Stothard, the FIDH deputy secretary-general, said.
She said Singapore in 2004 had the highest rate of capital punishment, but the island state has had zero executions in the eight years since then.
"[We] urge Thailand to take the lead in this important human rights issue."
Vietnam has also moved away from capital punishment, she said.
Though it still has the death penalty, it rarely uses it, she said, noting Vietnam increasingly has turned to rehabilitation as part of its drug enforcement policy.
Capital punishment has been used in Thailand since 1350.
Thailand held no executions from 2004-2008, or in 2010, or 2011. In 2009, there were two executions.
Danthong Breen, chairman of the Union Civil Liberty (UCL), said Thailand and Malaysia have the largest number of inmates in death row. As of October this year, Thailand had 649 prisoners on death row. According to a UCL report, Thailand executed 369 people between 1935 and 2003.
Mr Madelin suggested the public be asked whether they gain anything from maintaining capital punishment.
"Globally, research has shown that the death penalty does not deter crime," he said. "Crimes in many countries have in fact fallen off since the death penalty was abolished."
Pol Col Naras Savestanan, head of the Rights and Liberties Protection Department, said the elimination of the death penalty would require public support and the involvement of politicians.
The Ministry of Justice is researching the death penalty and surveying stakeholders, Pol Col Naras said. In the next two years the government could decide to reduce death sentences to life in prison, but it is not clear how current inmates on death row would be affected.
Pol Col Naras said the decision to eliminate or amend the death penalty ultimately would be up to lawmakers.
Malaysia's Bar Council member Andrew Khoo said public opinion on capital punishment is still influenced by emotion.
"People might not see [abolition] as a national priority," he said. "If a referendum is needed, we need to raise people's awareness."

Progress to Abolition in Thailand

                                                                           กำหนดการสัมมนา

เรื่อง สถานการณ์การยุติโทษประหารชีวิตในประเทศไทยและอาเซียน ปี ๒๕๕๕

วันพุธที่ ๑๒ ธันวาคม ๒๕๕๕ เวลา ๑๒.๓๐ – ๑๖.๓๐ น.

ณ ห้องประชุมบุญชูโรจนเสถียร ชั้น ๓ อาคารอเนกประสงค์ ๑  มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์

จัดโดย สมาคมสิทธิเสรีภาพของประชาชน , มหาวิทยาลัยธรรมศาสตร์

                                   สนับสนุนโดย สหภาพยุโรป  FIDH    สถานฑูตฝรั่งเศส

**********

๑๒.๓๐ – ๑๓.๐๐ น.            ลงทะเบียน

๑๓.๐๐ – ๑๓.๑๕ น.            เปิดการสัมมนา โดย Ms. Ana Beatriz Martins, Head of Political, Press

                                         and Information Section, Delegation of European Union

๑๓.๑๕ – ๑๓.๓๕ น.          รายงานสถานการณ์การยุติโทษประหารชีวิตในประเทศไทย

                                                ดร.แดนทอง  บรีน  ประธานสมาคมสิทธิเสรีภาพของประชาชน(สสส.)๑๓.๓๕ – ๑๔.๑๐ น.           สถานการณ์การยุติโทษประหารชีวิตทั่วโลก: Mr. Antoine Madelin,

                                         Director  of Intergovernmental Organizations Activities, FIDH

๑๔.๑๐ – ๑๕.๐๐ น.             สถานการณ์การยุติโทษประหารชีวิตในภูมิภาคอาเซียน

                                                ผู้แทนจากประเทศ เวียดนาม , มาเลเซีย , สิงคโปร์ , อินโดนีเซีย

                                                ดำเนินรายการโดย Ms. Debbie Stothard, Deputy Secretary-                                                                    General of FIDH and Coordinator of Altsean

๑๕.๐๐ – ๑๖.๑๕ น.             แลไปข้างหน้า การเปลี่ยนโทษประหารชีวิตเป็นจำคุกตลอดชีวิตใน

                                     ประเทศไทย

                                                พันตำรวจเอกณรัชต์ เศวตนันทน์    อธิบดีกรมคุ้มครองสิทธิและเสรีภาพ

                                                นายไพโรจน์ วายุภาพ        ประธานศาลฎีกา

                                                นายมณเทียร บุญตัน           สมาชิกวุฒิสภา

                                                ผู้สื่อข่าว

                                                Mr. Antoine Madelin, FIDH

                                                ดำเนินรายการโดย              นายพิทักษ์  เกิดหอม

๑๖.๑๕ – ๑๖.๓๐ น.            มุมมองของเหยื่อและอดีตนักโทษประหารชีวิต

๑๖.๓๐ น.                              ปิดการสัมมนา

“Progress to Abolition of the Death Penalty in Thailand and the Region, 2012”

Seminar on 12^th December, 2012, 12.30 to 16.30

Bunchoorochanasathian Meeting Room, 3^rd Floor, Aneekprasong Building 1 Thammasat University, Prachan Campus

Union for Civil Liberty (UCL) and Thammasat University

with support of the European Union, International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), and Ambassade de France

                                                       **************

12.30 – 13.00  Registration

13.00 – 13.15  Opening address by Ms. Ana Beatriz Martins, Head of Political, Press

                                    and Information Section, Delegation of the European Union

13.15 – 13.35  Current Situation on Abolition in Thailand

                        Dr. Danthong Breen, Chairman, UCL

13.35 – 14.10  Abolition on a World Scale

                        Mr. Antoine Madelin, Director of Intergovernmental                                          Organisations Activities, FIDH

14.10 – 15.00  Abolition in Thailand’s Neighbouring Countries

                        Representatives from Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Vietnam

                        Introduced by Ms Debbie Stothard, Deputy Secretary-General of FIDH                       and Coordinator of Altsean-Burma

15.00 – 16.15  Discussion on Replacing the Death Penalty with Life Imprisonment

                        Police General Narat Sewdanant, Director of Rights and Liberties

                        Protection Department, Ministry of Justice

                        Mr. Phairoj Wayuphab, President of Appeal Court

                        Mr. Monthian Bundan, Member of Senate

                        Representative of News Media

                        Mr. Antoine Madelin, FIDH  

                        Moderator Mr. Pithak Kedhom, Human Rights Lawyer

16.15 – 16.30  Testimony of ex-Death Penalty Prisoner, and Relative of Victim

16.30               Closure of Seminar

A joint call against the death penalty

Remarkable appeal by prominent Council of Europe Countries

Bangkok Post 19/10/2012

There are struggles that cannot be won single-handedly. One of these is the fight against capital punishment.

A lone warrior could not have succeeded in convincing so many countries to eliminate the death penalty. But through the combined efforts of many countries, international organisations, and civil society, working together to put an end to executions, we have succeeded.
Germany, Austria, France, Italy, Liechtenstein and Switzerland have been at the forefront of this campaign for the complete abolition of the death penalty. It is a movement for the preservation of human dignity.
As representatives of countries that uphold the same shared values, we join together in a united appeal for the abolition of the death penalty _ a practice for which there can no longer be any justification in the 21st century.
Over the past 20 years, more than 50 countries have turned their backs on capital punishment. More than 130 countries have abolished or placed a moratorium on the death penalty. There are now only some 50 countries left that still use the death penalty. These numbers are encouraging, and show that the initiatives and efforts undertaken until now have borne fruit. But we have not yet attained our goal, so that we must now redouble our commitment. As long as capital punishment still exists we will continue to fight against it.
The notion of killing in the name of justice is contrary to the fundamental values for which our countries stand. We intend to work together, with determination and perseverance, to ensure that the number of executions continues to decline, that judicial proceedings are made more transparent, and that further countries renounce the death penalty until this inhumane form of punishment has disappeared entirely.
The death penalty cannot be reconciled with respect for human rights and human dignity. It is in contradiction with the right of all human beings not to be exposed to torture or other cruel, inhuman, or humiliating treatment. What is more, executions are sometimes carried out as a result of discriminatory practices. And because they are final, there is no possibility of revising the sentence. In some cases, innocent people lose their lives. The risk that an innocent person could be executed is, in and of itself, reason enough to deny the death penalty any legitimacy.
Executions also do nothing to prevent crimes from being committed, and they do not make society any safer. For the families of crime victims, they provide neither justice nor relief.
These reflections seem obvious to us, living in countries where the death penalty was abolished many years ago. In order to achieve the complete elimination of capital punishment in all countries of the world, however, it will take a strong and unwavering commitment. Change does not come overnight.
It is a process of many small steps. The progress we have made until now is nevertheless substantial, and we must make sure that it continues. We will work for the abolition of the death penalty also in the future, for only a resolute political commitment can ensure that this form of punishment one day disappears.
In 2010, the United Nations General Assembly adopted by a vote of 109 to 41 a third resolution calling for a global moratorium on the death penalty. This resolution, which reaffirmed earlier versions adopted in 2007 and 2008, was introduced by our countries, the European Union, and numerous other countries from all regions of the world. In the current year this resolution will be put before the General Assembly once again for a vote. Our countries are making every effort to secure an even greater majority in its favour. This resolution underscores the progress that has been made, and signals that the worldwide trend towards abolition of the death penalty is now irreversible.
Public opinion plays a central role in the struggle against capital punishment. All peoples throughout the world must have access to information and the possibility of expressing their opinions freely.
It is only in this way that a reasoned decision is possible. Here, civil society and non-governmental organisations have a key role to play.
It is our intention to continue to work together in our opposition to the death penalty. This is a duty we share, born of our common values and the pursuit of an ideal that allows all human beings to live in dignity.

---

Edited excerpts from the joint declaration to mark the World Day Against Death Penalty. It has been signed by the foreign ministers of Switzerland, Mr Didier Burkhalter; Germany, Mr Guido Westerwelle; France, Mr Laurent Fabius; Liechtenstein, Ms Aurelia Frick; Austria, Mr Michael Spindelegger; and Italy, Mr Giulio Terzi.

Current Statistics of Prisoners Condemned to Death

The current numbers of prisoners condemned to death in Thailand show a reduction in numbers following the commutation of sentence of 57 prisoners on 11th August 2555 (2012 in Western Calender). The reduction in numbers since the previous statistic is less than 57 because of the increase in condemned prisoners due to a continuing application of the death penalty in Thai justice, which appears unaware of the implications of royal pardon.

ผู้ต้องราชทัณฑ์-โทษประหารชีวิต ประเทศไทย
26/10/2555
ตารางรวมทุกคดีความผิด Sentenced for all crimes
เพศ Gender	อุทธรณ์ In Appeal	ฎีกา before Supreme Court	เด็ดขาด Legal process complete	Total
ชาย men	346	218	21	585
หญิง women	55	9	0	64
รวม total	401	227	21	649
ความผิด พ.ร.บ.ยาเสพติดให้โทษ Drug Cases
เพศ	อุทธรณ์	ฎีกา	เด็ดขาด	รวม
ชาย	170	78	7	255
หญิง	45	8	0	53
รวม	215	86	7	308
คดีความผิดต่อชีวิตและอื่นๆ Homicide and Other
เพศ	อุทธรณ์	ฎีกา	เด็ดขาด	รวม
ชาย	176	140	14	330
หญิง	10	1	0	11
รวม	186	141	14	341